List: Publications

1Navigation 2Overview 3ArXiv sumbissions and drafts

Overview

Preliminary overview of papers, preprints, and working drafts in (constructive) logic.

ArXiv Submissions

Listed from most recent arXiv revision.

  • Remarks on Primitive Regulation

    2026

    arXiv:2605.18924 [math.LO] arXiv

    Proves and mechanizes in Rocq an obstruction theorem for primitive closure predicates over the implication-falsity fragment. The paper separates generative evaluation completeness from decisional excluded-middle completeness and shows that their conjunction forces a reflective fixed point whose classification collapses to inconsistency under modus ponens.

  • Carryless Pairing: Additive Pairing in the Fibonacci Basis

    2025–2026

    arXiv:2509.10382 [math.LO, cs.LO] arXiv

    Introduces a way to encode two natural numbers into one natural number using Fibonacci-based representations. The method avoids multiplication, factorization, or interleaving digits, and it is designed so encoding and decoding stay simple and predictable. It proves that the encoding is one-to-one, that valid encoded numbers can be recognized, and that the main results were formally checked in Rocq.

  • Considering The Satisfiability of Cubic Diophantine Equations

    2025–2026

    arXiv:2510.00759 [math.LO] arXiv

    Proves a bounded compilation result: for each fixed resource limit, checking a syntactic proof can be represented by a finite system of cubic Diophantine equations over a bounded domain. It also corrects earlier versions by withdrawing the stronger claim that this gave a reduction from unbounded theoremhood to one fixed bounded-domain cubic instance.

  • An Intuitionistic Glance at Primes

    2025–2026

    arXiv:2511.07774 [math.LO, cs.LO] arXiv

    Gives a proof-theoretic account of the constructive classification of positive integers as 1, prime, or composite. It develops bounded decision procedures, a recursive sieve for the primes, modular cancellation, and finite arithmetic certificates, while separating what Heyting Arithmetic proves internally from what depends on the standard interpretation of the natural numbers.

  • Adversarial Barrier in Uniform Class Separation

    2025–2026

    arXiv:2512.08149 [math.LO] arXiv

    The paper identifies a structural obstruction to uniformly separating two classes inside constructive arithmetic. The obstruction is not tied to what the classes mean; it appears whenever two evaluator predicates are maintained in parallel and inference is uniformly representable.

  • A Constructive Fragment of Physical Propositions

    2025–2026

    arXiv:2511.21296 [math.LO] arXiv

    Small philosophical argument that physically meaningful propositions are constrained by what admissible measurement can actually extract: finite observational sequences, terminating procedures, or stable uniform conditions.

  • The Solver's Paradox in Formal Problem Spaces

    2025–2026

    arXiv:2511.14665 [cs.CC] arXiv

    Structural analysis of global decision problems over arithmetically represented domains. The paper studies how class-quantification transports impredicativity into formal problem spaces, relating diagonalization, reflection, and uniform complexity statements.

  • On the Golden Ratio and Stable Self-Application

    2025–2026

    arXiv:2510.08934 [math.LO, cs.LO] arXiv

    This paper studies a boundary between local self-application and global self-certification. Irrational quantities are treated operationally, as procedures whose approximations are refined by effective update rules. The golden ratio Φ is used as a model of stable local recurrence: the reciprocal update R(x)=1+1/x has a unique positive fixed point and admits finite witnessed approximations.

DRAFTS

  • Typed Repair: EMNIST FROM λ-DEFINABLE EVALUATION AND SPECIALIZATION GATE

    2026

    Selfhosted .pdf

    Presents a logical pipeline for EMNIST-style classification where preprocessing, prediction rules, training traces, and evaluator behavior are made replayable and checkable. Instead of treating training as an opaque optimization run, it uses integer-valued repair steps that expose decidable invariants and concrete counterexamples when something fails.